Sargeant v. French

10 N.H. 444
CourtSuperior Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 15, 1839
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 N.H. 444 (Sargeant v. French) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sargeant v. French, 10 N.H. 444 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1839).

Opinion

Parker, C. J.

The judgment, having been rendered against the infant, on default, is erroneous. 1 Mass. R. 479, Knapp vs. Crosby; 1 Dallas 166, Sliver vs. Shelback; Dyer 104, a, Anderson vs. Warde; Cro. Jac. 466, Holford vs. Platt; Cro. Car. 307, Newport vs. Mildmay. Being entire, it must be reversed as to both. 6 N. H. Rep. 543, Whitmore vs. Delano, and auth. cited.

In some instances, upon the reversal of a judgment, this court can proceed to enter the judgment which ought to have been rendered in the original action. In others, further proceedings must be had. 5 N. H. Rep. 477, Favor vs. Philbrick; 7 N. H. Rep. 589, Ford vs. Wright; 4 N. H. Rep. 86, Hillsborough vs. Deering; Ditto 106, Holman vs. Kingsbury. But there is no motion upon that subject before the court.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burt v. Stevens
22 N.H. 229 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1850)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 N.H. 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sargeant-v-french-nhsuperct-1839.