Sargeant v. Director, Brooklyn Developmental Center
435 N.E.2d 1097, 56 N.Y.2d 628, 450 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3294
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sargeant v. Director, Brooklyn Developmental Center, 435 N.E.2d 1097, 56 N.Y.2d 628, 450 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3294 (N.Y. 1982).
435 N.E.2d 1097 (Sargeant v. Director, Brooklyn Developmental Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sutton v. Tennessee Civil Service Commission
779 S.W.2d 788 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1989)
Leon v. Meehan
112 A.D.2d 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Cardo v. Murphy
104 A.D.2d 884 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Ostoyich v. State
99 A.D.2d 839 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)