Sarfati v. DHK Contracting Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sarfati v. DHK Contracting Corp.

195 A.D.2d 505, 601 N.Y.S.2d 824, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7226

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 12, 1993·Published

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for breach of an employment contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), entered June 6, 1991, which granted the plaintiff’s motion to disqualify the defendants’ attorney.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff’s motion to disqualify the defendants’ attorney (see, S & S Hotel Ventures Ltd. Partnership v 777 S. H. Corp., 69 NY2d 437; Luk Lamellen u. Kupplungsbau GmbH v Lerner, 167 AD2d 451). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for breach of an employment contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), entered June 6, 1991, which granted the plaintiff’s motion to disqualify the defendants’ attorney.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff’s motion to disqualify the defendants’ attorney (see, S & S Hotel Ventures Ltd. Partnership v 777 S. H. Corp., 69 NY2d 437; Luk Lamellen u. Kupplungsbau GmbH v Lerner, 167 AD2d 451). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Sarfati v. DHK Contracting Corp., 195 A.D.2d 505, 601 N.Y.S.2d 824, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7226 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

195 A.D.2d 505 (Sarfati v. DHK Contracting Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related