Sarduy v. Baker

Supreme Court of Florida

Sarduy v. Baker

383 So. 2d 230, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4213

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 24, 1980·No. No. 58305·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In view of our decision in Simmons v. Faust, 358 So.2d 1358 (Fla.1978), the order of Judge Siegendorf holding the medical mediation act unconstitutional is not a trial court order appealable- to this Court. This cause is therefore transferred to the District Court of Appeal, Third District, with directions to remand to the judicial referee for termination of medical mediation jurisdiction in accordance with Aldana v. Holub, 381 So.2d 231 (Fla. 1980).

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

Opinion on transfer, Fla.App.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In view of our decision in Simmons v. Faust, 358 So.2d 1358 (Fla.1978), the order of Judge Siegendorf holding the medical mediation act unconstitutional is not a trial court order appealable- to this Court. This cause is therefore transferred to the District Court of Appeal, Third District, with directions to remand to the judicial referee for termination of medical mediation jurisdiction in accordance with Aldana v. Holub, 381 So.2d 231 (Fla. 1980).

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

Opinion on transfer, Fla.App.

Sarduy v. Baker, 383 So. 2d 230, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4213 (Fla. 1980).

Pincite

383 So. 2d 230 (Sarduy v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related