Sarco Co. of N.J. v. Gulliver
131 A. 923, 99 N.J. Eq. 432, 14 Stock. 432, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 540
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None. *Page 433
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sarco Co. of N.J. v. Gulliver, 131 A. 923, 99 N.J. Eq. 432, 14 Stock. 432, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 540 (N.J. 1926).
131 A. 923 (Sarco Co. of N.J. v. Gulliver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Harrison
109 F. Supp. 614 (D. New Jersey, 1953)
In re Berkeley Press, Inc.
42 F. Supp. 927 (D. New Jersey, 1942)
Business Finance Co. v. Weitz
93 F.2d 676 (Third Circuit, 1937)
Capital Bakers, Inc. v. Leahy
178 A. 648 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1935)
Bakers v. Leahy
178 A. 648 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1935)