Sarbov v. Burke

192 A.2d 804, 1963 D.C. App. LEXIS 264
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 12, 1963
DocketNo. 3251
StatusPublished

This text of 192 A.2d 804 (Sarbov v. Burke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sarbov v. Burke, 192 A.2d 804, 1963 D.C. App. LEXIS 264 (D.C. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This was a suit by appellees for property damage to an automobile. The car was damaged while under bailment at a parking lot owned by appellant. Appellant [805]*805contends (1) that appellee GEICO failed to establish a prima facie case, and (2) that appellee Burke’s claim for repairs is unreasonable.

We find no error. Brewer v. Drain, D.C.App., 192 A.2d 532.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brewer v. Drain
192 A.2d 532 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 A.2d 804, 1963 D.C. App. LEXIS 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sarbov-v-burke-dc-1963.