Saratoga & Washington Railroad v. McCoy

New York Supreme Court

Saratoga & Washington Railroad v. McCoy

8 How. Pr. 526

DecidedJanuary 15, 1854

StatusPublished

This text of 8 How. Pr. 526 (Saratoga & Washington Railroad v. McCoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saratoga & Washington Railroad v. McCoy, 8 How. Pr. 526 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1854).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court, (James, Justice,)

after consultation, granted the motion, (Cady, Justice, dissenting,) adopting the opinion of Justice Hand, in the case of Barber agt. Crossett, (6 How. Pr, R. 45,) and holding that when an officer, sued as such, succeeds in the action, he is entitled to double costs. That section 24, 2 R. S. 617, is not repealed by section 303 of the Code; nor is it inconsistent with section 468, but is in full force and effect.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court, (James, Justice,)

after consultation, granted the motion, (Cady, Justice, dissenting,) adopting the opinion of Justice Hand, in the case of Barber agt. Crossett, (6 How. Pr, R. 45,) and holding that when an officer, sued as such, succeeds in the action, he is entitled to double costs. That section 24, 2 R. S. 617, is not repealed by section 303 of the Code; nor is it inconsistent with section 468, but is in full force and effect.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 How. Pr. 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saratoga-washington-railroad-v-mccoy-nysupct-1854.