Sarasota County v. Reichert

413 So. 2d 163
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 29, 1982·No. AF-148·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

413 So.2d 163 (1982)

SARASOTA COUNTY and R.P. Hewitt & Associates of Florida, Inc., Appellants,
v.
Roger A. REICHERT, Appellee.

No. AF-148.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 29, 1982.

John J. O'Riorden of Dickenson, O'Riorden, Gibbons, Quale, Shields & Carlton, P.A., Sarasota, for appellants.

Harry G. Goodheart, III, of Harry G. Goodheart, III, P.A., Brandenton, and Wood, Whitsell, Karp, Wellbaum, Miller & Seitl, P.A., Sarasota, for appellee.

MILLS, Judge.

The employer/carrier appeal from a workers' compensation order awarding claimant permanent total disability benefits. We affirm.

Apportionment is proper only when the pre-existing condition is disabling at the time of the accident or at the time of the award. Caruso v. Crown Liquors, 379 So.2d 1317 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). There is competent substantial evidence that claimant was not disabled at either time because of a pre-existing condition.

LARRY G. SMITH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sarasota County v. Reichert, 413 So. 2d 163 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

413 So. 2d 163 (Sarasota County v. Reichert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Luttrell v. Roger Holler Chevrolet
625 So. 2d 921 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Lawrence v. O.B. Cannon & Sons, Inc.
579 So. 2d 812 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Escambia County Council v. Goldsmith
465 So. 2d 655 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Structural Systems, Inc. v. Worthen
463 So. 2d 502 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)