Saranac Land and Timber Company v. . Roberts

New York Court of Appeals

Saranac Land and Timber Company v. . Roberts

121 N.E. 862, 224 N.Y. 657, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1064

New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 12, 1918·Published

Opinion

Chase, J.

The order so far as appealed from should be reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, and the motion, so far as the appointment of another referee is concerned, remitted to the Special Term for further consideration upon the facts before it,

The first question certified should be answered in the *659 negative, the second in the affirmative, and the third question should be answered as follows: “ It stands referred to the former referee subject to the appointment -of a new referee by the court on authority of Saranac Land & Timber Co. v. Roberts (224 N. Y. 337), decided herewith.”

His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan and Crane, JJ., concur; McLaughlin, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chase, J.

The order so far as appealed from should be reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, and the motion, so far as the appointment of another referee is concerned, remitted to the Special Term for further consideration upon the facts before it,

The first question certified should be answered in the *659 negative, the second in the affirmative, and the third question should be answered as follows: “ It stands referred to the former referee subject to the appointment -of a new referee by the court on authority of Saranac Land & Timber Co. v. Roberts (224 N. Y. 337), decided herewith.”

His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan and Crane, JJ., concur; McLaughlin, J., not voting.

Saranac Land and Timber Company v. . Roberts, 121 N.E. 862, 224 N.Y. 657, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1064 (N.Y. 1918).

Pincite

121 N.E. 862 (Saranac Land and Timber Company v. . Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.