Saranac Land and Timber Company v. . Roberts

New York Court of Appeals

Saranac Land and Timber Company v. . Roberts

121 N.E. 862, 224 N.Y. 657, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1064

DecidedNovember 12, 1918

StatusPublished

This text of 121 N.E. 862 (Saranac Land and Timber Company v. . Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saranac Land and Timber Company v. . Roberts, 121 N.E. 862, 224 N.Y. 657, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1064 (N.Y. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Chase, J.

The order so far as appealed from should be reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, and the motion, so far as the appointment of another referee is concerned, remitted to the Special Term for further consideration upon the facts before it,

The first question certified should be answered in the *659 negative, the second in the affirmative, and the third question should be answered as follows: “ It stands referred to the former referee subject to the appointment -of a new referee by the court on authority of Saranac Land & Timber Co. v. Roberts (224 N. Y. 337), decided herewith.”

His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan and Crane, JJ., concur; McLaughlin, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chase, J.

The order so far as appealed from should be reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, and the motion, so far as the appointment of another referee is concerned, remitted to the Special Term for further consideration upon the facts before it,

The first question certified should be answered in the *659 negative, the second in the affirmative, and the third question should be answered as follows: “ It stands referred to the former referee subject to the appointment -of a new referee by the court on authority of Saranac Land & Timber Co. v. Roberts (224 N. Y. 337), decided herewith.”

His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan and Crane, JJ., concur; McLaughlin, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 N.E. 862, 224 N.Y. 657, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saranac-land-and-timber-company-v-roberts-ny-1918.