Sarajian v. Pilafian
This text of 158 So. 2d 545 (Sarajian v. Pilafian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, plaintiff in the trial' court, seeks review of an adverse final summary judgment, dismissing her amended complaint of negligence with prejudice following the filing of an answer setting up the affirmative defense of the Statute of Limitations. See:§ 95.11, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; Manning v. Serrano, Fla.1957, 97 So.2d 688.
The amended complaint, bottomed solely on the tortious charge, was governed by the four year Statute of Limitations, which commenced to run on the date of the alleged breach of duty on the part of the ap-pellee. It appearing that the cause was instituted more than four years after the date of the alleged negligent act, the trial judge correctly applied the Statute of Limitations in entering the summary judgment and, therefore, same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 So. 2d 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sarajian-v-pilafian-fladistctapp-1963.