Sarahia Benn v. Rebecca Herr

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 16, 2025
• Docket: 24-1375
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1375 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/16/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1375

SARAHIA BENN,

Debtor - Appellant,

v.

REBECCA A. HERR,

Trustee - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Brendan A. Hurson, District Judge. (1:24-cv-00746-BAH)

Submitted: June 12, 2025 Decided: June 16, 2025

Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed in part, dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sarahia Benn, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1375 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/16/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Sarahia Benn appeals the district court’s order denying her motions for a temporary

restraining order and a preliminary injunction. Absent extraordinary circumstances not

present here, we lack jurisdiction to consider the denial of a motion for a temporary

restraining order, see Virginia v. Tenneco, Inc., 538 F.2d 1026, 1029-30 (4th Cir. 1976),

we dismiss this portion of Benn’s appeal. As to the denial of Benn’s request for a

preliminary injunction, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See

Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. W. Pocahontas Props. Ltd. P’ship, 918 F.3d 353, 366

(4th Cir. 2019) (providing preliminary injunction standards). We therefore affirm the

portion of the district court’s order denying Benn’s motion for a preliminary injunction.

Benn v. Hurr, No. 1:24-cv-00746-BAH (D. Md. Mar. 19, 2024). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART