Sarah Potter v. Estate of Arthur Carl Davis
This text of Sarah Potter v. Estate of Arthur Carl Davis (Sarah Potter v. Estate of Arthur Carl Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
November 25, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
147512 Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack SARAH POTTER, David F. Viviano, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices
v SC: 147512 COA: 308878 Oakland CC: 2011-119383-NI F. PATRICK DEVINE, Personal Representative of the Estate of ARTHUR CARL DAVIS, Defendant-Appellee, and TITAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.
____________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 20, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. November 25, 2013 h1118 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sarah Potter v. Estate of Arthur Carl Davis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sarah-potter-v-estate-of-arthur-carl-davis-mich-2013.