Sarah Louise Smith and Javan Paul Smith v. Richard D. Powell

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 18, 2022·No. 03-21-00615-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00615-CV

Sarah Louise Smith and Javan Paul Smith, Appellants

v.

Richard D. Powell, Appellee

FROM THE 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY NO. 21376, THE HONORABLE EVAN C. STUBBS, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants’ briefs were originally due on June 6, 2022. On July 18, 2022, this

Court sent a notice to appellant informing them that their briefs were overdue and that a failure

to file a satisfactory response by July 28, 2022, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for

want of prosecution. To date, appellants have not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________ Edward Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: November 18, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sarah Louise Smith and Javan Paul Smith v. Richard D. Powell, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Sarah Louise Smith and Javan Paul Smith v. Richard D. Powell (Sarah Louise Smith and Javan Paul Smith v. Richard D. Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.