Sarah Louise Smith and Javan Paul Smith v. Richard D. Powell
This text of Sarah Louise Smith and Javan Paul Smith v. Richard D. Powell (Sarah Louise Smith and Javan Paul Smith v. Richard D. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-21-00615-CV
Sarah Louise Smith and Javan Paul Smith, Appellants
v.
Richard D. Powell, Appellee
FROM THE 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY NO. 21376, THE HONORABLE EVAN C. STUBBS, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants’ briefs were originally due on June 6, 2022. On July 18, 2022, this
Court sent a notice to appellant informing them that their briefs were overdue and that a failure
to file a satisfactory response by July 28, 2022, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for
want of prosecution. To date, appellants have not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
__________________________________________ Edward Smith, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Smith
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: November 18, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sarah Louise Smith and Javan Paul Smith v. Richard D. Powell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sarah-louise-smith-and-javan-paul-smith-v-richard-d-powell-texapp-2022.