Sarah Coursen and Katherine Cook v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia Corporation, Pamela Van Duyn, Terri Johnson, Joanna B. Kuhnhenn, Gayle McCann Laurie Jo Franz, and Debbie Rohl v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia Corporation
This text of 773 F.2d 1049 (Sarah Coursen and Katherine Cook v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia Corporation, Pamela Van Duyn, Terri Johnson, Joanna B. Kuhnhenn, Gayle McCann Laurie Jo Franz, and Debbie Rohl v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sarah COURSEN and Katherine Cook, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, INC., a Virginia corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
Pamela VAN DUYN, Terri Johnson, Joanna B. Kuhnhenn, Gayle
McCann, Laurie Jo Franz, and Debbie Rohl,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, INC., a Virginia corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 84-3853 to 84-3861.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 8, 1985.
ORDER
Before GOODWIN and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges, and VUKASIN,* District Judge.
The original opinion in this matter, which appears at 764 F.2d 1329 (9th Cir.1985), contains a typographical error on page 1342. The sentence immediately following headnote 23 on page 1342 should be changed to read as follows: "While a plaintiff cannot appeal a voluntary dismissal without prejudice, he or she may appeal a dismissal with prejudice."
The Honorable John P. Vukasin, Jr., United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
773 F.2d 1049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sarah-coursen-and-katherine-cook-v-ah-robins-company-inc-a-virginia-ca9-1985.