Sarabia v. Warden FCI Sandstone
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Felipe Cabrera Sarabia, Civ. No. 25-706 (JWB/DJF)
Petitioner,
v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Warden FCI Sandstone, OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Respondent.
United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on March 10, 2025. (Doc. No. 5.) No objection has been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent a timely objection, the R&R is reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found. Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and proceedings in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The March 10, 2025 R&R (Doc. No. 5) is ACCEPTED; and 2. Petitioner Felipe Cabrera Sarabia’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Date: April 9, 2025 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sarabia v. Warden FCI Sandstone (Sarabia v. Warden FCI Sandstone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.