Sarabia v. Warden FCI Sandstone

District Court, D. Minnesota·Decided April 9, 2025·No. 0:25-cv-00706·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Felipe Cabrera Sarabia, Civ. No. 25-706 (JWB/DJF)

Petitioner,

v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Warden FCI Sandstone, OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Respondent.

United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on March 10, 2025. (Doc. No. 5.) No objection has been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent a timely objection, the R&R is reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found. Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and proceedings in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The March 10, 2025 R&R (Doc. No. 5) is ACCEPTED; and 2. Petitioner Felipe Cabrera Sarabia’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Date: April 9, 2025 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sarabia v. Warden FCI Sandstone, (mnd 2025).

Sarabia v. Warden FCI Sandstone (Sarabia v. Warden FCI Sandstone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related