Sara Slack v. Atlantic White Tower System, Inc.

284 F.2d 746
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 27, 1960
Docket8096_1
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 284 F.2d 746 (Sara Slack v. Atlantic White Tower System, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sara Slack v. Atlantic White Tower System, Inc., 284 F.2d 746 (4th Cir. 1960).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case involves the same issue as Williams v. Howard Johnson’s Restaurant, 4 Cir., 1959, 268 F.2d 845. Here, the plaintiff, a Negro newspaper reporter, was travelling by automobile from Washington, D. C., to New York City. While passing through Baltimore, she stopped at the defendant’s restaurant located along U. S. Route 40 in that city. She was there refused service because of her race. As a result, she brought this suit in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, seeking a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief. The District Court dismissed her complaint upon the authority of the Williams case, supra, and this appeal follows. See Slack v. Atlantic White Tower System, Inc., D.C.D.Md.1960, 181 F.Supp. 124.

The only question that need be considered now is what effect, if any, does the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Boynton v. Virginia, 1960, 81 S.Ct. 182, have upon the holding of the Williams case. In Boynton, the Court held that a restaurant, connected with an interstate bus terminal, may not under the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., discriminate against members of the public because of race. There, the Court’s opinion deliberately stated:

“We are not holding that every time a bus stops at a wholly independent roadside restaurant the Interstate Commerce Act requires that restaurant service be supplied in harmony with the provisions of that Act.” 81 S.Ct. at page 188.

Since the Supreme Court has thus expressly refrained from ruling upon this issue, Williams v. Howard Johnson’s Restaurant, supra, dictates affirmance here.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seidenberg v. McSorleys' Old Ale House, Inc.
317 F. Supp. 593 (S.D. New York, 1970)
Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.
398 U.S. 144 (Supreme Court, 1970)
Baines v. City of Danville, Virginia
337 F.2d 579 (Fourth Circuit, 1964)
Eaton v. Grubbs
216 F. Supp. 465 (E.D. North Carolina, 1963)
United States v. City of Jackson, Mississippi
206 F. Supp. 45 (S.D. Mississippi, 1962)
State v. Goldfinch
132 So. 2d 860 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1961)
Randolph v. Commonwealth
119 S.E.2d 817 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1961)
Henderson v. Trailway Bus Company
194 F. Supp. 423 (E.D. Virginia, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
284 F.2d 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sara-slack-v-atlantic-white-tower-system-inc-ca4-1960.