Sara E. Binion and Wendy M. Binion v. Elizabeth Valencia Allen
This text of Sara E. Binion and Wendy M. Binion v. Elizabeth Valencia Allen (Sara E. Binion and Wendy M. Binion v. Elizabeth Valencia Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00403-CV ___________________________
SARA E. BINION AND WENDY M. BINION, Appellants
V.
ELIZABETH VALENCIA ALLEN, Appellee
On Appeal from the 89th District Court Wichita County, Texas Trial Court No. DC89-CV2022-1635
Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On February 2, 2023, we notified appellants that their brief had not been filed
as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellants filed
with the court an appellants’ brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining
the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P.
10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because appellants have failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: March 23, 2023
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sara E. Binion and Wendy M. Binion v. Elizabeth Valencia Allen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sara-e-binion-and-wendy-m-binion-v-elizabeth-valencia-allen-texapp-2023.