Sara Dubose v. Jerry Kay Dubose, Individually, and as Co-Trustee of the Dubose Family Trust, & John Steen Dubose, Individually, and as Co-Trustee of the Dubose Family Trust, and Cheryl Dubose & San Saba Royalty Company
This text of Sara Dubose v. Jerry Kay Dubose, Individually, and as Co-Trustee of the Dubose Family Trust, & John Steen Dubose, Individually, and as Co-Trustee of the Dubose Family Trust, and Cheryl Dubose & San Saba Royalty Company (Sara Dubose v. Jerry Kay Dubose, Individually, and as Co-Trustee of the Dubose Family Trust, & John Steen Dubose, Individually, and as Co-Trustee of the Dubose Family Trust, and Cheryl Dubose & San Saba Royalty Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-11-00209-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
SARA DUBOSE, Appellant,
v.
JERRY KAY DUBOSE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE DUBOSE FAMILY TRUST, & JOHN STEEN DUBOSE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE DUBOSE FAMILY TRUST, AND CHERYL DUBOSE & SAN SABA ROYALTY COMPANY, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the County Court of Gonzales County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on September 23, 2011. On
October 5, 2011, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas
Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of
this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not
significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response
has been received from appellant.
Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain her failure to file a brief, file a
motion for extension of time to file her brief, or file her brief. Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 3rd day of November, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sara Dubose v. Jerry Kay Dubose, Individually, and as Co-Trustee of the Dubose Family Trust, & John Steen Dubose, Individually, and as Co-Trustee of the Dubose Family Trust, and Cheryl Dubose & San Saba Royalty Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sara-dubose-v-jerry-kay-dubose-individually-and-as-co-trustee-of-the-texapp-2011.