Sar Camp Wisdom Plaza, L.P. v. Houk Air Conditioning, Inc.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 2-10-033-CV
SAR CAMP W ISDOM PLAZA, L.P. APPELLANT
V.
HOUK AIR CONDITIONING, INC. APPELLEE
----------
FROM THE 342ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ----------
W e have considered the parties’ “Agreed Motion To Dismiss.” It is the court’s
opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See
Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue.
See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and W ALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: May 20, 2010
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sar Camp Wisdom Plaza, L.P. v. Houk Air Conditioning, Inc. (Sar Camp Wisdom Plaza, L.P. v. Houk Air Conditioning, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.