Sar Camp Wisdom Plaza, L.P. v. Houk Air Conditioning, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 20, 2010·No. 02-10-00033-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 2-10-033-CV

SAR CAMP W ISDOM PLAZA, L.P. APPELLANT

V.

HOUK AIR CONDITIONING, INC. APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 342ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ----------

W e have considered the parties’ “Agreed Motion To Dismiss.” It is the court’s

opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue.

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and W ALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: May 20, 2010

1  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sar Camp Wisdom Plaza, L.P. v. Houk Air Conditioning, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Sar Camp Wisdom Plaza, L.P. v. Houk Air Conditioning, Inc. (Sar Camp Wisdom Plaza, L.P. v. Houk Air Conditioning, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.