Sappington v. State
753 S.W.2d 31, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 594, 1988 WL 41002
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals from an order of the court, granting his Rule 27.26 motion and resentencing him to a total of three years’ imprisonment. We affirm. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sappington v. State, 753 S.W.2d 31, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 594, 1988 WL 41002 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988).
753 S.W.2d 31 (Sappington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.