Sappah Shovel Service, Inc. v. Airmont Homes, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sappah Shovel Service, Inc. v. Airmont Homes, Inc.

26 A.D.2d 590, 272 N.Y.S.2d 960, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3909

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 590 (Sappah Shovel Service, Inc. v. Airmont Homes, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sappah Shovel Service, Inc. v. Airmont Homes, Inc., 26 A.D.2d 590, 272 N.Y.S.2d 960, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In two consolidated actions, one by Sappah Shovel Service, Inc., inter alia to foreclose a mechanic’s lien and the other by Maggiolo Corporation to recover a balance for work, labor and services, etc., in -which two of the defendants interposed interpleader and third-party complaints against plaintiff Sappah, defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered May 27, 1965 in favor of plaintiffs upon their respective complaints and dismissing the interpleader and third-party complaints, after a nonjury trial (the judgment was amended by a later order). Judgment (as amended) affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to plaintiffs jointly. In our opinion, the decision of the learned trial court, contained sufficient ultimate facts to satisfy the requirements of CPLR 4213 (suba. [b]). In addition, we have examined the various other contentions raised by appellants and find no basis for disturbing the awards. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In two consolidated actions, one by Sappah Shovel Service, Inc., inter alia to foreclose a mechanic’s lien and the other by Maggiolo Corporation to recover a balance for work, labor and services, etc., in -which two of the defendants interposed interpleader and third-party complaints against plaintiff Sappah, defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered May 27, 1965 in favor of plaintiffs upon their respective complaints and dismissing the interpleader and third-party complaints, after a nonjury trial (the judgment was amended by a later order). Judgment (as amended) affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to plaintiffs jointly. In our opinion, the decision of the learned trial court, contained sufficient ultimate facts to satisfy the requirements of CPLR 4213 (suba. [b]). In addition, we have examined the various other contentions raised by appellants and find no basis for disturbing the awards. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 590, 272 N.Y.S.2d 960, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sappah-shovel-service-inc-v-airmont-homes-inc-nyappdiv-1966.