Sapp v. State
This text of 86 S.E. 823 (Sapp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. One who, while on a porch of an occupied dwelling-house, shoots a pistol at, toward, or into any portion thereof, is guilty of shooting “at,” “toward,” or “into” the house, in violation of the act approved August 13, 1910 (Acts, 1910, p. 137), Park’s Penal Code, § 115 (a) ; English v. State, 10 Ga. App. 791 (74 S. E. 286).
2. There was no error prejudicial to the accused in any of the instructions of the court objected to, when they are considered in the light of the entire charge, the evidence adduced and the defendant’s statement at the trial. [341]*3413. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 S.E. 823, 17 Ga. App. 340, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sapp-v-state-gactapp-1915.