Sapp v. State
Opinion
1. One who, while on a porch of an occupied dwelling-house, shoots a pistol at, toward, or into any portion thereof, is guilty of shooting “at,” “toward,” or “into” the house, in violation of the act approved August 13, 1910 (Acts, 1910, p. 137), Park’s Penal Code, § 115 (a) ; English v. State, 10 Ga. App. 791 (74 S. E. 286).
2. There was no error prejudicial to the accused in any of the instructions of the court objected to, when they are considered in the light of the entire charge, the evidence adduced and the defendant’s statement at the trial. [341]*3413. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
86 S.E. 823 (Sapp v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.