Sapp v. State
This text of 800 So. 2d 639 (Sapp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant challenges his felony conviction. The information alleged that Appellant drove when his license had been suspended or revoked on two prior occasions, in violation of section 322.34(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1999). Appellant claims the information was fundamentally flawed, and therefore the circuit court lacked jurisdiction over his case, citing Hues v. State, 771 So.2d 591 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). However, unlike the defendant in Huss, Appellant here failed to challenge the information prior to his felony conviction, and accordingly waived any defect. See West v. State, 758 So.2d 1232 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Mesa v. State, 632 So.2d 1094 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
800 So. 2d 639, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14640, 2001 WL 1231696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sapp-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.