Sapp v. State

732 So. 2d 333, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12444, 1998 WL 689687
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sapp v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 763 So. 2d 1257
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 7, 1998·No. No. 97-3122·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Kenneth Sapp, was convicted by a jury of burglary of a conveyance and attempting to elude a law enforcement officer. The trial court sentenced him to consecutive terms of ten years on each charge as an habitual offender. We find that the sentences should not have been imposed consecutively, as the offenses arose out of a single criminal episode. See Hale v. [334]*334State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 909, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994). Accordingly, we affirm the convictions but reverse the sentences and remand this case to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with Hale.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sapp v. State, 732 So. 2d 333, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12444, 1998 WL 689687 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

732 So. 2d 333 (Sapp v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hale v. State
630 So. 2d 521 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)