Sapp v. State

54 So. 515, 170 Ala. 39, 1911 Ala. LEXIS 44
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided February 2, 1911·Published

Opinion

SIMPSON, J.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of selling or otherwise disposing of spirituous, vinous, or. malt liquors contrary to law. There was1 [41] no error in overruling the motion to quash and the demurrer to the affidavit.—Redd v. State, 167 Ala. 96, 52 South. 886; Carnley v. State, 162 Ala. 94, 50 South. 362; Pell City Manufacturing Co. v. Swearingen, 156 Ala. 397, 47 South. 272; Higdon et al. v. Stuckey, 169 Ala. 148, 53 South. 301.

The affidavit charges that the offense was committed Avithin 12 months before the commencement of the prosecution, and also since the 1st of September, 1909; thus placing it after the enactment of the statute of August, 25, 1909.

The judgment of the court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Dowdell, C. J., and McClellan and Mayfield, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sapp v. State, 54 So. 515, 170 Ala. 39, 1911 Ala. LEXIS 44 (Ala. 1911).

54 So. 515 (Sapp v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pell City Manufacturing Co. v. Swearingen
47 So. 272 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1908)
Carnley v. State
40 So. 362 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1909)
Red v. State
52 So. 885 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1910)
Higdon v. Stuckey
53 So. 301 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1910)