Sapp v. State

54 So. 515, 170 Ala. 39, 1911 Ala. LEXIS 44
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedFebruary 2, 1911
StatusPublished

This text of 54 So. 515 (Sapp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sapp v. State, 54 So. 515, 170 Ala. 39, 1911 Ala. LEXIS 44 (Ala. 1911).

Opinion

SIMPSON, J.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of selling or otherwise disposing of spirituous, vinous, or. malt liquors contrary to law. There was1 [41]*41no error in overruling the motion to quash and the demurrer to the affidavit.—Redd v. State, 167 Ala. 96, 52 South. 886; Carnley v. State, 162 Ala. 94, 50 South. 362; Pell City Manufacturing Co. v. Swearingen, 156 Ala. 397, 47 South. 272; Higdon et al. v. Stuckey, 169 Ala. 148, 53 South. 301.

The affidavit charges that the offense was committed Avithin 12 months before the commencement of the prosecution, and also since the 1st of September, 1909; thus placing it after the enactment of the statute of August, 25, 1909.

The judgment of the court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Dowdell, C. J., and McClellan and Mayfield, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pell City Manufacturing Co. v. Swearingen
47 So. 272 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1908)
Carnley v. State
40 So. 362 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1909)
Red v. State
52 So. 885 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1910)
Higdon v. Stuckey
53 So. 301 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 So. 515, 170 Ala. 39, 1911 Ala. LEXIS 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sapp-v-state-ala-1911.