Saporita v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Saporita v. Brown

180 A.D.2d 597

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 27, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 A.D.2d 597 (Saporita v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saporita v. Brown, 180 A.D.2d 597 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of the respondent Police Commissioner dated April 19, 1990, which refused to reappoint petitioner as a New York City police officer pursuant to Public Officers Law § 30 (1) (e), unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding (transferred to this court pursuant to CPLR 7804 [g] by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Stanley Sklar, J.], entered December 11, 1990) is dismissed, without costs.

Although the proceeding was improperly transferred to this court, we have examined the issues raised, and conclude that petitioner’s trial admissions to an ongoing relationship with, and acceptance of a gratuity from, a tow truck operator regulated by respondent and his presence at the tow truck operator’s shop for personal reasons while on duty, justified [598]*598respondent’s determination not to reappoint him to the police force. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Ross, Asch and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of the respondent Police Commissioner dated April 19, 1990, which refused to reappoint petitioner as a New York City police officer pursuant to Public Officers Law § 30 (1) (e), unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding (transferred to this court pursuant to CPLR 7804 [g] by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Stanley Sklar, J.], entered December 11, 1990) is dismissed, without costs.

Although the proceeding was improperly transferred to this court, we have examined the issues raised, and conclude that petitioner’s trial admissions to an ongoing relationship with, and acceptance of a gratuity from, a tow truck operator regulated by respondent and his presence at the tow truck operator’s shop for personal reasons while on duty, justified [598]*598respondent’s determination not to reappoint him to the police force. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Ross, Asch and Kassal, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 A.D.2d 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saporita-v-brown-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack