Sapko v. State

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Sapko v. State

4 A.3d 1229, 298 Conn. 923, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 364

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 22, 2010·No. SC 18680·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 123 Conn. App. 18 (AC 30962), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly uphold the determination of the compensation review board that the compensable work injuries were not the proximate cause of the decedent’s death?”

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

[924]*924The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18680. John J. Quinn, in support of the petition. Lawrence G. Widem, assistant attorney general, in opposition. Decided September 22, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 123 Conn. App. 18 (AC 30962), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly uphold the determination of the compensation review board that the compensable work injuries were not the proximate cause of the decedent’s death?”

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

[924]*924The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18680. John J. Quinn, in support of the petition. Lawrence G. Widem, assistant attorney general, in opposition. Decided September 22, 2010

Sapko v. State, 4 A.3d 1229, 298 Conn. 923, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 364 (Colo. 2010).

Pincite

4 A.3d 1229 (Sapko v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related