Sapiro v. Levenstein

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sapiro v. Levenstein

282 So. 2d 11

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 11, 1973

DocketNo. 71-1244

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 282 So. 2d 11 (Sapiro v. Levenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sapiro v. Levenstein, 282 So. 2d 11 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on July 25, 1972 (266 So.2d 40) reversing the final judgment of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed June 20, 1973 (279 So.2d 858) and mandate now lodged in this- court, quashed this court’s judgment with directions to reinstate the judgment of the circuit court;

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore entered in this court on September 18, 1972 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed July 25, 1972 is vacated, the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, and the judgment of the circuit court herein appealed from is reinstated and affirmed. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on July 25, 1972 (266 So.2d 40) reversing the final judgment of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed June 20, 1973 (279 So.2d 858) and mandate now lodged in this- court, quashed this court’s judgment with directions to reinstate the judgment of the circuit court;

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore entered in this court on September 18, 1972 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed July 25, 1972 is vacated, the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, and the judgment of the circuit court herein appealed from is reinstated and affirmed. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 So. 2d 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sapiro-v-levenstein-fladistctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack