Saperston v. Holdaway

New York Court of Appeals

Saperston v. Holdaway

985 N.E.2d 423, 20 N.Y.3d 1052

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 19, 2013

StatusPublished

Cited by17 cases

This text of 985 N.E.2d 423 (Saperston v. Holdaway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saperston v. Holdaway, 985 N.E.2d 423, 20 N.Y.3d 1052 (N.Y. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), appeal [1053]*1053dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the two-Justice dissent at the Appellate Division is not on a question of law within the meaning of CPLR 5601 (a).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott. Judge Rivera taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), appeal [1053]*1053dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the two-Justice dissent at the Appellate Division is not on a question of law within the meaning of CPLR 5601 (a).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott. Judge Rivera taking no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

985 N.E.2d 423, 20 N.Y.3d 1052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saperston-v-holdaway-ny-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack