Saperstein v. Berman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Saperstein v. Berman

219 A.D. 747

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1927

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 219 A.D. 747 (Saperstein v. Berman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saperstein v. Berman, 219 A.D. 747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the learned trial justice as to the offensive conditions prevailing on plaintiff’s premises were sustained by the evidence. The prohibition against “ spite fences ” (Real Prop. Law, § 3, added by Laws of 1922, chap. 374) has no reference to a fence erected to protect the defendants’ property from such obnoxious conditions. Present — Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the learned trial justice as to the offensive conditions prevailing on plaintiff’s premises were sustained by the evidence. The prohibition against “ spite fences ” (Real Prop. Law, § 3, added by Laws of 1922, chap. 374) has no reference to a fence erected to protect the defendants’ property from such obnoxious conditions. Present — Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 A.D. 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saperstein-v-berman-nyappdiv-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack