Sap America, Inc. v. Wellogix, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Sap America, Inc. v. Wellogix, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJanuary 12, 2018

Docket17-1176

StatusUnpublished

This text of Sap America, Inc. v. Wellogix, Inc. (Sap America, Inc. v. Wellogix, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sap America, Inc. v. Wellogix, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SAP AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

WELLOGIX, INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee

WELLOGIX TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, Defendant/Counterclaimant

ACCENTURE LLP, Counterclaim Defendant ______________________

2017-1176 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas in Nos. 4:10-cv-01224, 4:11-cv- 02840, Judge Simeon Timothy Lake, III. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

THARAN GREGORY LANIER, Jones Day, Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JOSEPH BEAUCHAMP, HOW-YING ALBERT LIOU, Houston, TX; ISRAEL SASHA MAYERGOYZ, Chicago, IL; MEGAN S. WOODWORTH, Venable LLP, Washington, DC.

RAFFI MELKONIAN, Wright Close & Barger, LLP, Houston, TX, argued for defendant/counterclaimant- appellee. Also represented by RUSSELL HOLLENBECK. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 12, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI