Sanzone v. R.H. Macy & Co.
This text of 190 A.D.2d 617 (Sanzone v. R.H. Macy & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Burton S. Sherman, J.), entered June 17, 1991, granting respondents’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing the action against respondents, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The IAS Court properly determined that the documentary proof, deeds and evidence of corporate mergers established that the respondents were neither the owners nor in control of the Herald Square store on December 29, 1988, the day plaintiff Charles Sanzone, an employee of Macy’s Northeast Inc. was injured. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 A.D.2d 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanzone-v-rh-macy-co-nyappdiv-1993.