Sanzone v. R.H. Macy & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sanzone v. R.H. Macy & Co.

190 A.D.2d 617

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 23, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Burton S. Sherman, J.), entered June 17, 1991, granting respondents’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing the action against respondents, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court properly determined that the documentary proof, deeds and evidence of corporate mergers established that the respondents were neither the owners nor in control of the Herald Square store on December 29, 1988, the day plaintiff Charles Sanzone, an employee of Macy’s Northeast Inc. was injured. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Burton S. Sherman, J.), entered June 17, 1991, granting respondents’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing the action against respondents, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court properly determined that the documentary proof, deeds and evidence of corporate mergers established that the respondents were neither the owners nor in control of the Herald Square store on December 29, 1988, the day plaintiff Charles Sanzone, an employee of Macy’s Northeast Inc. was injured. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Sanzone v. R.H. Macy & Co., 190 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

190 A.D.2d 617 (Sanzone v. R.H. Macy & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related