Sanwire Corporation v. Intercept Music Group, Inc., et al.
Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
SANWIRE CORPORATION, Case No. 2:25-cv-01533-ART-NJK 7 Plaintiff, gly. Order [Docket No. 36] INTERCEPT MUSIC GROUP, INC., et al., 10 Defendants. 11 Pending before the Court is the parties’ proposed joint discovery plan and scheduling order. 12] Docket No. 36. 13 The proposed discovery plan improperly imposes a stay of discovery pending the 14] resolution of Defendant’s motion to dismiss and/or stay, without addressing the relevant standards. 15] “The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide for automatic or blanket stays of discovery 16] when a potentially dispositive motion is pending.” Tradebay, LLC v. eBay, Inc., 278 F.R.D. 597, 17] 601 (D. Nev. 2011). 18 Accordingly, the joint discovery plan is DENIED without prejudice. Docket No. 36. The 19] parties are ORDERED to submit an amended joint proposed discovery plan and scheduling order, 20] or a proper request to stay discovery pending resolution of the motion to dismiss addressing the 21} relevant standards, by October 23, 2025. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: October 16, 2025 24 7 ASS 25 United Stee Magi trate Judge 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sanwire Corporation v. Intercept Music Group, Inc., et al. (Sanwire Corporation v. Intercept Music Group, Inc., et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.