Santwan Dewayne Gray v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 17, 2003
Docket06-03-00140-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Santwan Dewayne Gray v. State (Santwan Dewayne Gray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santwan Dewayne Gray v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion



In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana


______________________________


No. 06-03-00140-CR



SANTWAN GRAY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee




On Appeal from the County Court

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 42156





Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Ross



MEMORANDUM OPINION


          Santwan Gray has filed a motion in which he asks this Court to dismiss his appeal. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.2, his motion is granted.

          We dismiss the appeal.

                                                                           Donald R. Ross

                                                                           Justice


Date Submitted:      December 16, 2003

Date Decided:         December 17, 2003


Do Not Publish

font-family: Arial">Date Submitted: July 2, 2009

Date Decided: July 3, 2009



Do Not Publish

1.

Washington appeals from four separate convictions of harassment in companion appeals, cause numbers 06-08-00228-CR, 06-08-00229-CR, 06-00230-CR, and 06-00231-CR, in which opinions are released this date. He was sentenced in each case to 120 days' confinement, with the sentences to run concurrently and fines of $2,000.00.

2.

Since we agree this case presents no reversible error, we also, in accordance with Anders, grant counsel's request to withdraw from further representation of Washington in this case. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Washington wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Washington must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review, or Washington must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the last timely motion for rehearing that was overruled by this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with this Court, after which it will be forwarded to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals along with the rest of the filings in this case. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Santwan Dewayne Gray v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santwan-dewayne-gray-v-state-texapp-2003.