Santucci v. Power
252 N.E.2d 128, 25 N.Y.2d 897, 304 N.Y.S.2d 593, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1098
Opinion
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld, and Judges Burke, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson. Judges Scileppi and Bergan dissent and vote to reverse on the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.
Motion by candidate Zelman to intervene denied. Counsel for movant in open court stated that he was withdrawing his application made at Special Term and that he consented to vacatur of, a stay of the special election contained in an order to show cause which he had obtained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Santucci v. Power, 252 N.E.2d 128, 25 N.Y.2d 897, 304 N.Y.S.2d 593, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1098 (N.Y. 1969).
252 N.E.2d 128 (Santucci v. Power) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Leaks v. Rosenfeld
91 A.D.2d 685 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Doherty v. Mahoney
59 A.D.2d 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Weill v. Erickson
49 A.D.2d 895 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)