Santucci v. Power

252 N.E.2d 128, 25 N.Y.2d 897, 304 N.Y.S.2d 593, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1098
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 24, 1969
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 252 N.E.2d 128 (Santucci v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santucci v. Power, 252 N.E.2d 128, 25 N.Y.2d 897, 304 N.Y.S.2d 593, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1098 (N.Y. 1969).

Opinion

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld, and Judges Burke, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson. Judges Scileppi and Bergan dissent and vote to reverse on the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.

Motion by candidate Zelman to intervene denied. Counsel for movant in open court stated that he was withdrawing his application made at Special Term and that he consented to vacatur of, a stay of the special election contained in an order to show cause which he had obtained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leaks v. Rosenfeld
91 A.D.2d 685 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Doherty v. Mahoney
59 A.D.2d 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Weill v. Erickson
49 A.D.2d 895 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 N.E.2d 128, 25 N.Y.2d 897, 304 N.Y.S.2d 593, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santucci-v-power-ny-1969.