Santucci v. Power
This text of 252 N.E.2d 128 (Santucci v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld, and Judges Burke, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson. Judges Scileppi and Bergan dissent and vote to reverse on the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.
Motion by candidate Zelman to intervene denied. Counsel for movant in open court stated that he was withdrawing his application made at Special Term and that he consented to vacatur of, a stay of the special election contained in an order to show cause which he had obtained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 N.E.2d 128, 25 N.Y.2d 897, 304 N.Y.S.2d 593, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santucci-v-power-ny-1969.