Santucci v. Pearsall

475 N.E.2d 124, 64 N.Y.2d 736, 485 N.Y.S.2d 753, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4905
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 20, 1984
StatusPublished

This text of 475 N.E.2d 124 (Santucci v. Pearsall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santucci v. Pearsall, 475 N.E.2d 124, 64 N.Y.2d 736, 485 N.Y.S.2d 753, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4905 (N.Y. 1984).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the papers submitted do not comply with the requirements of section 500.11 (d) of the Court of Appeals Rules of Practice, including the requirement of demonstrating timeliness of the motion for leave to appeal made at the Appellate Division (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
475 N.E.2d 124, 64 N.Y.2d 736, 485 N.Y.S.2d 753, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santucci-v-pearsall-ny-1984.