Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Santovenia v. Dispatch Services

Santovenia v. Dispatch Services

842 So. 2d 222, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4744, 2003 WL 1798241
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 8, 2003
DocketNo. 1D02-1560
StatusPublished

This text of 842 So. 2d 222 (Santovenia v. Dispatch Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santovenia v. Dispatch Services, 842 So. 2d 222, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4744, 2003 WL 1798241 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order of the Judge of Compensation Claims dismissing the petition for lack of jurisdiction is affirmed without prejudice to appellant to first proceed to the appropriate circuit court to resolve the parties’ dispute over the lien agreement. IMC Agrico MP, Inc. v. Faulk, 783 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ„ and SMITH, LARRY G„ Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

IMC AGRICO MP, INC. v. Faulk
783 So. 2d 321 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
842 So. 2d 222, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4744, 2003 WL 1798241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santovenia-v-dispatch-services-fladistctapp-2003.