Santos v. State

92 A.D.3d 590, 938 N.Y.2d 799

This text of 92 A.D.3d 590 (Santos v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santos v. State, 92 A.D.3d 590, 938 N.Y.2d 799 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

The Court of Claims correctly determined that where an individual has failed to personally verify his claim brought pursuant to the Unjust Conviction and Imprisonment Act, that claim must be dismissed (Long v State of New York, 7 NY3d 269, 276 [2006]).

We have considered the remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Sweeny, Moskowitz and DeGrasse, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Long v. State of New York
852 N.E.2d 1150 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 A.D.3d 590, 938 N.Y.2d 799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santos-v-state-nyappdiv-2012.