Santos v. State
79 So. 3d 112, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 521, 2012 WL 127244
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 18, 2012
Docket4D10-4810
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 79 So. 3d 112 (Santos v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Santos v. State, 79 So. 3d 112, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 521, 2012 WL 127244 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
Opinion
We affirm with prejudice the summary denial of appellant’s untimely postconviction motion. The alleged “newly discovered evidence,” that jury selection was not transcribed for the direct appeal in 1994, could have been discovered with due diligence within the two-year time limit. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b)(1).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Philip Walter Jones v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
906 F.3d 1339 (Eleventh Circuit, 2018)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
79 So. 3d 112, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 521, 2012 WL 127244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santos-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.