Santos v. Mabus

446 F. App'x 571
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 16, 2011
DocketNos. 10-2151, 11-1488
StatusPublished

This text of 446 F. App'x 571 (Santos v. Mabus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santos v. Mabus, 446 F. App'x 571 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Eugene Santos appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of the Navy on Santos’s employment discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006), and granting the Secretary’s motion to supplement the record. We have reviewed the record and find that the district court did not commit reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See Santos v. Winter, No. 2:08-cv-03994-DCN, 2010 WL [572]*5723788045 (D.S.C. Sept. 21, 2010) & (May 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
446 F. App'x 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santos-v-mabus-ca4-2011.