Santos v. Burns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Santos v. Burns

40 A.D.2d 987, 338 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3213

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 987 (Santos v. Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Santos v. Burns, 40 A.D.2d 987, 338 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3213 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the minor plaintiff and for medical expenses, etc., of his mother, based inter alia on alleged negligence and breach of warranty, defendant Simplicity Manufacturing Company, Inc. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered February 24, 1972, as denied in part its motion to strike interrogatories propounded by plaintiffs. Order modified by adding thereto a provision that interrogatories numbered 3, 4, 5, 6, 26 and 27 also need not be answered. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. In our opinion the interrogatories herein additionally struck are objectionable because they improperly inquire into the action and conduct of appellant occurring after the date of the subject injury and in no respect deal with any matter occurring prior thereto or relating thereto. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the minor plaintiff and for medical expenses, etc., of his mother, based inter alia on alleged negligence and breach of warranty, defendant Simplicity Manufacturing Company, Inc. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered February 24, 1972, as denied in part its motion to strike interrogatories propounded by plaintiffs. Order modified by adding thereto a provision that interrogatories numbered 3, 4, 5, 6, 26 and 27 also need not be answered. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. In our opinion the interrogatories herein additionally struck are objectionable because they improperly inquire into the action and conduct of appellant occurring after the date of the subject injury and in no respect deal with any matter occurring prior thereto or relating thereto. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Christ, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 987, 338 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santos-v-burns-nyappdiv-1972.