Santos v. Anderson
146 A. 916, 106 N.J.L. 596, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 199
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Campbell, White, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kats, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Santos v. Anderson, 146 A. 916, 106 N.J.L. 596, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 199 (N.J. 1929).
146 A. 916 (Santos v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vitale v. Hotel California, Inc.
446 A.2d 880 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1982)
Beekwilder v. Beekwilder
102 A.2d 642 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)