Home/Connecticut Superior Court/Santos v. Ahlberg, No. Cv01 38 03 97 S (Jan. 7, 2003)

Santos v. Ahlberg, No. Cv01 38 03 97 S (Jan. 7, 2003)

2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 518
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedJanuary 7, 2003
DocketNo. CV01 38 03 97 S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 518 (Santos v. Ahlberg, No. Cv01 38 03 97 S (Jan. 7, 2003)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santos v. Ahlberg, No. Cv01 38 03 97 S (Jan. 7, 2003), 2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 518 (Colo. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO STRIKE THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT
In the third-party complaint, Kurt M. Ahlberg attempts to assert an indemnity claim against SIR V, LLC on the ground Ahlberg was passively negligent and SIR V, LLC was actively negligent. See Crotta v. HomeDepot, Inc. 249 Conn. 634, 641, 732 A.2d 767 (1999). The legal doctrine on which Ahlberg relies applies to joint tortfeasors. Kurt M. Ahlberg and SIR V, LLC are not joint tortfeasors. As Ahlberg points out on page eight of his brief, which he filed in objection to the motion to strike, "the action against the defendant in the present action is for professional negligence and the action against the third party is for breach of contract. . . ."

The motion to strike the third-party complaint is granted.

___________________ THIM, J.

CT Page 519

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crotta v. Home Depot, Inc.
732 A.2d 767 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santos-v-ahlberg-no-cv01-38-03-97-s-jan-7-2003-connsuperct-2003.