Santos Palomo v. State
This text of Santos Palomo v. State (Santos Palomo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
___________________________________________________________________
SANTOS PALOMO
, Appellant,THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
___________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
Appellant seeks to appeal from an order imposing sanctions on defendant and continuing or modifying community supervision. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
In Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977), the Court held that a defendant may not appeal from an order continuing a defendant on probation with amended terms and conditions. There is neither constitutional nor statutory authority which would confer jurisdiction on this Court to hear an appeal from an order modifying probationary conditions. Basaldua, 558 S.W.2d at 5.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.
Opinion delivered and filed this
the 26th day of October, 2000.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Santos Palomo v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santos-palomo-v-state-texapp-2000.