Santos-Bahena v. Holder
This text of 328 F. App'x 458 (Santos-Bahena v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Petitioner Mario Santos-Bahena, native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order denying his second motion to reopen to apply for adjustment of status as numerically barred. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion. Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.2008). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
To the extent Santos-Bahena challenges the Board’s refusal to reopen proceedings sua sponte, we dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. Ekimian v. INS, 303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir.2002).
Santos-Bahena does not challenge the Board’s determination that his second motion to reopen exceeded the number limit. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(A); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). Because the motion is number-barred, we deny the petition for review, and we need not address Santos-Bahena’s remaining challenges.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
328 F. App'x 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santos-bahena-v-holder-ca9-2009.