Home/Supreme Court/Santoro v. United States

Santoro v. United States

392 U.S. 301, 88 S. Ct. 2054, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1106, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1362
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 10, 1968
Docket1219
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 392 U.S. 301 (Santoro v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santoro v. United States, 392 U.S. 301, 88 S. Ct. 2054, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1106, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1362 (1968).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968). Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fogel v. Chestnutt
668 F.2d 100 (Second Circuit, 1981)
United States v. Joslyn
371 F. Supp. 423 (D. Arizona, 1974)
People v. Thomas
190 N.W.2d 250 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1971)
United States v. Horace W. Sims, United States of America v. Ralph Howard Freeman, United States of America v. Vester Lee Price
430 F.2d 1089 (Sixth Circuit, 1970)
Phillip Santoro v. United States
402 F.2d 920 (Ninth Circuit, 1968)
United States v. Sims
297 F. Supp. 1009 (W.D. Tennessee, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
392 U.S. 301, 88 S. Ct. 2054, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1106, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santoro-v-united-states-scotus-1968.