Santoro v. United States

392 U.S. 301, 88 S. Ct. 2054, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1106, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1362
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 10, 1968·No. 1219·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968). Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Santoro v. United States, 392 U.S. 301, 88 S. Ct. 2054, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1106, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1362 (1968).

392 U.S. 301 (Santoro v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fogel v. Chestnutt
668 F.2d 100 (Second Circuit, 1981)
United States v. Joslyn
371 F. Supp. 423 (D. Arizona, 1974)
People v. Thomas
190 N.W.2d 250 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1971)
Phillip Santoro v. United States
402 F.2d 920 (Ninth Circuit, 1968)
United States v. Sims
297 F. Supp. 1009 (W.D. Tennessee, 1968)