Santoro v. Principi

15 Vet. App. 434, 2002 WL 341987
CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
DecidedFebruary 28, 2002
Docket98-2373
StatusPublished

This text of 15 Vet. App. 434 (Santoro v. Principi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santoro v. Principi, 15 Vet. App. 434, 2002 WL 341987 (Cal. 2002).

Opinion

*435 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On May 30, 2000, the Court dismissed this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Judgment was entered on June 28, 2000. On December 20, 2001, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) reversed this Court’s decision on the ground that a Notice of Appeal addressed to the Court with an incorrect zip code was, nonetheless, “properly addressed to the Court” for purposes of 38 U.S.C. § 7266(a)(3)(B) (now § 7266(c)(2), as redesignated by § 507(b)(3) of the Veterans Education and Benefits Expansion Act of 2001, Pub.L. No. 107-103, § 507(b)(3), 115 Stat. 976, 997 (2001)). Santoro v. Principi 274 F.3d 1366, 1367 (Fed.Cir.2001). The Federal Circuit issued its mandate on February 11, 2002.

On consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the appeal is reinstated. It is further

ORDERED that, not later than 30 days after the date of this order, the Secretary file with the Clerk and serve on the appellant the designation of the record on appeal in accordance with Rule 10(a) of the Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. It is further

ORDERED that the appeal is returned to the single judge for disposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Vet. App. 434, 2002 WL 341987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santoro-v-principi-cavc-2002.