Santoro v. Mirschel
269 A.D. 1046, 59 N.Y.S.2d 279
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 10, 1945·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order dismissing on the merits appellant’s petition for an order under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act directing respondents, constituting the Board of Trustees of the Village of Hempstead, to issue to appellant a license for the year 1945 to conduct a restaurant,, unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present -— Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ. [184 Misc. 666.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Santoro v. Mirschel, 269 A.D. 1046, 59 N.Y.S.2d 279 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).
269 A.D. 1046 (Santoro v. Mirschel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vunk v. Waldbauer
44 Misc. 2d 561 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Dubato v. Board of Trustees
8 Misc. 2d 346 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)