Santoro v. Mirschel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Santoro v. Mirschel

269 A.D. 1046, 59 N.Y.S.2d 279

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 10, 1945

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 269 A.D. 1046 (Santoro v. Mirschel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Santoro v. Mirschel, 269 A.D. 1046, 59 N.Y.S.2d 279 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Order dismissing on the merits appellant’s petition for an order under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act directing respondents, constituting the Board of Trustees of the Village of Hempstead, to issue to appellant a license for the year 1945 to conduct a restaurant,, unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present -— Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ. [184 Misc. 666.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order dismissing on the merits appellant’s petition for an order under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act directing respondents, constituting the Board of Trustees of the Village of Hempstead, to issue to appellant a license for the year 1945 to conduct a restaurant,, unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present -— Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ. [184 Misc. 666.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D. 1046, 59 N.Y.S.2d 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santoro-v-mirschel-nyappdiv-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack