Santorelli v. Perales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Santorelli v. Perales

116 A.D.2d 724, 498 N.Y.S.2d 329, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51576

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 27, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 116 A.D.2d 724 (Santorelli v. Perales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Santorelli v. Perales, 116 A.D.2d 724, 498 N.Y.S.2d 329, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51576 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent State Commissioner of Social Services dated February 11, 1985, made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the local agency discontinuing petitioner’s home relief and medical assistance.

Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The determination that petitioner willfully and without good cause violated his duty to accept a job referral (see, 18 NYCRR 385.7) was supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 234).

We have considered petitioner’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent State Commissioner of Social Services dated February 11, 1985, made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the local agency discontinuing petitioner’s home relief and medical assistance.

Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The determination that petitioner willfully and without good cause violated his duty to accept a job referral (see, 18 NYCRR 385.7) was supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 234).

We have considered petitioner’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 A.D.2d 724, 498 N.Y.S.2d 329, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santorelli-v-perales-nyappdiv-1986.