Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Santora v. State

Santora v. State

791 So. 2d 1257, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11927, 2001 WL 957394
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 24, 2001
DocketNo. 5D00-2411
StatusPublished

This text of 791 So. 2d 1257 (Santora v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santora v. State, 791 So. 2d 1257, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11927, 2001 WL 957394 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dawn Santora appeals her judgment and sentence which were entered by the trial court after she entered a plea of nolo contendere on the charge of possessing cocaine. We affirm her conviction but strike that portion of her sentence which orders her to report to the Orange County Collections Court because the administrative order creating that court was declared invalid by this court in Blackiston v. State, 772 So.2d 554 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

Judgement and Sentence AFFIRMED as modified.

COBB, HARRIS, and PALMER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blackiston v. State
772 So. 2d 554 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
791 So. 2d 1257, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11927, 2001 WL 957394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santora-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.